← Back to the Field Guide
Emotional TacticsAcademic research concept

Workplace Incivility

Low-intensity rudeness with ambiguous intent, small enough to shrug off any single time, corrosive because it repeats and can spiral into worse conflict.

Workplace Incivility

One-liner: Low-intensity rudeness with ambiguous intent, small enough to shrug off any single time, corrosive because it repeats and can spiral into worse conflict.

Also known as / related terms: Incivility spiral, low-intensity deviant workplace behavior, interpersonal disrespect, rudeness norm erosion.

What it is: Workplace incivility is a formal construct from organizational behavior research, defined by Lilia Cortina, Christine Pearson, and Lynne Andersson as low-intensity deviant behavior with ambiguous intent to harm, violating workplace norms of mutual respect. Andersson and Pearson’s foundational 1999 paper in Academy of Management Review, “Tit for Tat? The Spiraling Effect of Incivility in the Workplace,” argued that unlike overt aggression, incivility is deniable in the moment, the offender can always claim it was unintentional or that you’re overreacting, which is exactly what lets it repeat unchecked and escalate. Christine Porath’s later research, summarized in her 2013 Harvard Business Review piece “The Price of Incivility” (with Pearson), found that 98% of workers report experiencing uncivil treatment at work and that reported weekly rudeness roughly doubled between 1998 and 2011. The core danger isn’t any single incident, it’s the chronic drip and the tendency for incivility to spiral: a small slight prompts a small retaliation, which prompts a bigger one.

What it looks like (workplace): A manager routinely talks over you in meetings, “forgets” to cc you on emails you should be on, and answers your questions with a sigh or a clipped tone, none of it dramatic enough to raise on its own, but it happens every week.

Why they do it: Often it isn’t a calculated tactic at all, it’s stress spilling over, an unconscious status assertion, or a workplace culture where nobody has ever pushed back on small disrespect, so it keeps repeating.

How to protect yourself:

Cross-links: Covert Digs / Dog Whistling, Stonewalling, Character Anchoring.

Sources:

Label note: Established academic construct in organizational behavior research, not a site coining. It’s included as the foundational, lower-intensity entry point on the spectrum: most of the sharper tactics elsewhere in this guide describe more deliberate patterns, while incivility describes the ambiguous, chronic baseline that can either stay minor or spiral into them.

A note on labeling: Academic research concept: studied in peer-reviewed personality or organizational psychology.You cannot diagnose someone else. You can protect yourself.

More in Emotional Tactics

View all in Emotional Tactics →